Looks like I’m the only one who prefers warm colors
I think @Suki2019 and @Jade_NL are a little bit dark in the shadows. @Thomas_Do seems to have a greenish tint and there’s also some crazy stuff going on in the background, done by the tone equalizer. @Soupy In terms of brightness and contrast similar to mine, just colder. The JPG shows some artifact on the snout, but it doesn’t show up und DT when I open your xmp.
Just my impressions base on my taste. I don’t claim to be right
Thanks for showing your edits. Hop for more to come.
Hi @Jade_NL , thanks for your answer, yes i am on windows.
what i did: first i tried to reproduce this on a different computer with the same dev-Version and found this blue eye again. then following your advice, i downloaded the newest build, loaded the happy little dog and applied the existing pp3: blue eye again in a little different shape.
Both are NEF-files, but i cannot reproduce on other NEF-files.
Now, since i cannot reproduce on other pics, i dont have any idea, how to create an issue on github…
Yes, the background is problematic. Below I did an edit masking out the background. Looks better to me now. @apostel338, I can not see, or measure a greenish tint. If anything, I see more of a red cast. Where do you see this green?
Just to be absolutely sure I re-downloaded the RAW from this topic, the Dublin Bay Rose RAW and your pp3. This time I loaded them into my RT version that I use for personal stuff (version 5.8-3050). I shoot with Nikon so I also tried them out on a Z6II, D750 and D700 NEF file, same result.
I do see that denoise is happening when I turn it on/off, but no blue artefact. Tried with and without setting a neutral profile before loading your pp3.
I’m not able to reproduce this.
EDIT: @apostel338 : Yep, turned it on. Also tried removing and turning on/off the other 2.
@Jade_NL , yes, i downloaded both fies from this topic. Did you save the file to disk? The blue will not show in RT, only after export.
Edit:
I tried with export to external editor, but also by save the file. No difference.
@marter : You should file a bug report. If more people are able to reproduce this and even if it turns out to be a quality/subsampling settings issue, this should not happen.
As you can see in my previous reply I’m not able to reproduce, but I’m no RT authority, maintainer or developer. I’m just lucky I guess
apostel338,
I like yours.
I thought I was on the same tack as you, with colorbalanceRGB, but added more whites (de-saturated)… different approach to the contrast EQ as well…
I was shooting for “color negative film”… in the feeling.
Yes I enjoy lower contrast edits, particularly in the background.
Yes, unfortunately I didn’t notice that until after upload - on laptop I don’t see all highlight detail unless I tilt the screen back, which I forgot to do here. I’m not sure what causes that artifact but am fighting with the software, it often displays around blown highlights in a much more noticeable fashion, and I constantly have to compress history to clear it. Has only happened since 3.6.0.3 (mac). I should upgrade to a more recent development version.